Site electricity at the Pune yard (synthetic)
Two parties agree (V1)Can be filed
Geography: IN
P5 · 34.6P95 · 50.0
41.6 tCO2ebetween 34.6 and 50.0 about 90% of the time (P5 to P95) The median is the middle estimate. The band runs from P5 to P95: the true value falls inside it about 90% of the time.Two parties agree (V1)A tier says how the evidence behind a figure was obtained. It is evidence quality, not assurance.
Why this tier
Two parties agree (V1): independent source evidence.
How to move this up
Add a second, independent record of the same quantity.
Who to check it with
O. Haddad (synthetic), site engineer at the Pune yard.
What could we add
A supplier statement or a meter reading for the same weeks.
Chain of evidence
The tier describes only the quantity.
Quantity
- 58,400 kWh from the records listed below
Factor
- FACTOR-15: 0.712 kgCO2e per kWh, geography IN
Where it comes from
- Pune yard team (synthetic) · primary recordDocument and a second party · 2026-Q2 · Kept as received58,400 kWh, GSD 1.10 · Two parties agree (V1)
- Instrument slot: empty
- Practitioner slot: empty. No assurance engagement is recorded for this period.
What was added
- Revenue meter photo readYoursRail R3, Sensors
What should we add next?
Pick something you could add and whose it would be. The answer is the engine’s.
Nothing is picked yet.
Band over time
Not known, because this figure has only one computed band this period.
For auditors
- kgCO2e
- 41,600 (P5 34,600, P95 50,000)
- GSDs
- Document and a second party 1.1 · factor 0.1
- Factor
- FACTOR-15, geography IN
- Verdict
- concordant
- z
- Not computed, because there is one record
- Criteria
- CS-GROUP-2026.v1, PROPOSED, not ratified